While
prowling the new release section of one of the local Blockbuster’s
in the area, I happened upon a film that made me laugh. What caught
my attention was the title, Night of the Dead, though just in
passing, I had mistakenly thought it was the classic Night of the
Living Dead, and the cover art was different than what I had
seen before. There’s good reason for that as it’s not Romero’s film,
but nice ploy to lure people in.
Now, boldly above this is the statement, “more shocking than
Re-Animator,” and that’s really a big classic to try and take
on. We also have find that the film comes from “master of horror
Eric Forsberg,” who, upon checking his bio on IMDB, has a grand
total of one horror film he’s ever direction. Sure, on is official
site he credits Alien Abduction, but that's more science
fiction I'm afraid, and he also wants to credit Snakes of a Train
(the knock offs show no sign of wear) but he only wrote the
scipt., This one. I see how it works now. Well, Aaron and myself
have recently completed the first draft for a horror film ourselves,
and thus I say that we are also masters of horror at this point.
Where in the hell is our parade?
All that aside, Night of the Dead: Leben Tod (and that part
is conveniently left off the packaging, otherwise you wouldn’t think
it was Romero’s film in passing) really borrows as much as it
feasibly can from Re-Animator without treading the grounds
that would bring about a lawsuit. Dr. Gabriel Schreklich (Louis
Graham) has been working on a formula to bring the dead back to
life.
Okay, yes, very familiar, but instead of featuring a glowing, green
reagent (just like is shown on the cover) the good doctor first
seems to have engineered Pepto-Bismol to do his evil work, then
later a darker substance that very well could be watered down
teriyaki sauce. This is stored in a refrigerator that also houses
many forms of what could only be described as Cool Aide, and
Purplesaurus Rex seems to also be in the mix.
Anyway, Dr West . . . . I’m mean, Dr. Schreklich’s wife and daughter
are killed in a horrible (actually funny) automobile accident and we
then fast-forward a year where the doctor has set up a new hospital
with very few patients. Working along side him is his nephew Peter
Sturben (Gabriel Womack) and pregnant wife Anais (Joey Jalalian) who
wants to leave and go to a real hospital to have their child. That’s
all well and good, until an illegal immigrant couple and their
injured, adult aged anchor baby show up at the hospital in need of
medical attention. It seems to be the perfect chance to test out the
latest version of his formula, but the plan goes horribly wrong at
Miskatonic University . . . oh, the hospital rather. Sorry about
that.
So, how is Night of the Dead more shocking than
Re-Animator. Well, in this case I suppose the shock first off is
that someone would actually put up the cash to finance the film.
Second would be that a distributor decided to release it on DVD,
knowing good and well that the film was going to have every horror
fan on the face of the planet raking it across the coals because of
the obvious rip-off. You want me to keep going? Fine, the third
reason is that aside from the other ridiculous claims on the
packaging, you find that this is the unrated director’s cut, amazing
for a film that probably only saw a theatrical run in the director’s
home town. Let’s not forget the final claim that it’s an instant
cult hit. These are the reasons that it’s more shocking, and it has
nothing to do with the movie itself.
Night of the Dead is filled with bad acting, special effects
that show effort but become laughable, clichéd ideas, a horrible
script, ineffective lighting, an amateur approach at terror . . . .
it’s really just a bad film all the way around the board. Okay, when
you have a scene that requires darkness, using a filter on the scene
doesn’t make it mysterious, it simply makes me, and I’m sure others,
laugh. Bad edits don’t make a good film, and there are plenty of
them to be found here. There’s also the case of the “magical
shotgun” towards the end of the film that somehow manages to get off
over 30 shots without reloading. I think it was actually around 31
shots, but I lost count due to laughing too much. Plus, why do we
find some zombies can’t be taken down by a bullet while others it
just takes one shot? Beats the hell out of me.
One of the most important things in any zombie film though isn’t
necessarily the plot, but it’s the zombies themselves. What we find
in Night of the Dead are zombies that are both fast and slow,
meaning maybe the length of being deceased and reanimated has
bearing on things, but that really isn’t discussed. The zombies also
talk, mentioning how they are so hungry and need food (human flesh.)
They also seem to have a magical quality about them, capable of
dragging a human far too quickly across floors, then disappearing
from a room with no other exit into a hallway that also seems to be
a dead end, then once again appearing right behind our victim. We
also find a reversal of Re-Animator when the doctor has his
head ripped from his shoulders, then reattached to the body of a
zombie which previously had its head bashed in.
Oh goodie, the DVD has some special features as well. If you’re
really interested, there’s a making of feature, but to be honest, I
didn’t even bother. There’s also commentary from the master of
horror himself, Eric Forsberg. There’s even a music video from the
band Kissing Violet who provided a song for the film, and if the
performance in the video is any indication, than this could very
well be one of the most boring acts to see live. Also included is
Forsberg short, It Takes Guts, another horror film, so I
guess he's technically done two, but I don't think you can count
something done in your teen years as a film so much as a learning
experiment.
So, is Night of the Dead simply one of the worst zombie films
ever put to celluloid? Actually, it’s not as Day of the Dead 2
still holds that honor, and for the sake of argument, probably
always will, but Night of the Dead easily comes in second or
third. It took some inventive individuals in the 70’s and 80’s to
bring the zombie genre to where it is, and with the new millennium,
Eric Forsberg and a number of other directors seem determined to
drive the nails into the coffin and finish it for good. Night of
the Dead is the type of film I would suggest you not even see on
a dare, especially if you’re a fan of Re-Animator. You’ll
only find yourself disappointed and enraged.
-mike-